Chibuikem Diala
The controversy surrounding the National Institute for Hospitality and Tourism (NIHOTOUR) Act 2022 and the NIHOTOUR Regulations 2025 raises a a lot greater query about the way forward for tourism governance in Nigeria.
My concern has at all times been that when regulation is pushed extra by income era than by business improvement, skilled requirements and repair supply, it turns into counterproductive. Nigeria wants a tourism governance framework constructed on correct separation of powers, clearly outlined mandates and coordinated tasks amongst related businesses.
However, one other dimension deserves critical consideration: the proposed constitutional modification looking for to maneuver tourism and tourism-related issues to the Concurrent Legislative List.
Under the present constitutional association, issues not assigned to the Exclusive or Concurrent Legislative Lists typically fall inside the residual legislative competence of the states. The proposed modification might basically change this place by expressly empowering each federal and state governments to legislate on tourism.
This is the place the true dialog ought to start.
If tourism strikes to the Concurrent List, what occurs to the authorized arguments at present being superior towards features of the NIHOTOUR and NTDA Acts?
One might fairly argue that the modification would strengthen the federal authorities’s constitutional foundation for tourism regulation and supply NIHOTOUR with a stronger argument in defending features of its mandate. Whether it will in the end validate the disputed provisions of the NIHOTOUR Act is one other matter solely.
Is the Concurrent List, subsequently, the trump card NIHOTOUR could also be ready for in its authorized battle?
It is a risk the business can not afford to disregard.
However, strengthening the constitutional foundation for federal laws doesn’t routinely validate each provision of an present Act or resolve disputes over regulatory overreach.
This brings me to the State Houses of Assembly. Are our legislators, together with members of the Committees on Culture and Tourism, absolutely conscious of the implications of the modification for his or her state tourism businesses, hospitality legal guidelines, licensing preparations, inspection regimes and income buildings? Or will they approve it with out adequately analyzing its long-term penalties?
There can be the query of the independence and information capability of our State Commissioners for Tourism. Do they possess the requisite constitutional, authorized and business information to objectively advise their governors and state legislatures on the far-reaching implications of this modification? Or will political concerns overshadow impartial skilled judgment?
I ask this as a result of tourism governance requires greater than political appointments and administrative supervision. It requires a sound understanding of tourism economics, constitutional legislation, hospitality regulation, funding, institutional governance and the operational realities of the business.
If commissioners aren’t adequately geared up to advise on these issues, or if their recommendation is pushed primarily by political concerns moderately than impartial skilled evaluation, the states danger making choices whose long-term penalties they might not absolutely recognize.
The State Houses of Assembly should not rely solely on government recommendation. They ought to interact impartial authorized consultants and tourism professionals to interrogate the proposal. A constitutional modification of this magnitude shouldn’t be authorized just because it’s offered pretty much as good for tourism; the states should perceive what they stand to realize, what they may lose, and the long-term implications for his or her regulatory powers and tourism establishments.
Equally necessary is the way forward for our present institutional framework. The NIHOTOUR Act 2022, the NIHOTOUR Regulations 2025 and the Nigerian Tourism Development Authority (NTDA) Act 2022 are present devices. Their overlapping regulatory tasks have already raised considerations inside the business. HOMAL has additionally not too long ago secured a High Court judgement towards NIHOTOUR, with N10 million in prices reportedly awarded towards the institute.
If the constitutional modification passes, will the NIHOTOUR and NTDA Acts be reviewed and amended to replicate the brand new constitutional realities? Will their respective mandates be clearly outlined to remove duplication in registration, inspections, skilled licensing and compliance prices?
I’m not against inserting tourism on the Concurrent Legislative List. National coordination and customary requirements have their deserves. But concurrent jurisdiction should not change into a licence for competing businesses to train overlapping powers. It shouldn’t be a device to frustrate tourism companies in Nigeria.
Tourism associations, skilled our bodies and different business stakeholders should now converse out. They ought to interact their respective state governments and State Houses of Assembly, demand public consultations and be certain that significant discussions happen earlier than choices are made. The business should assist form the phrases of this proposed constitutional change, with clearly outlined tasks and safeguards that shield companies, encourage funding and advance the collective curiosity of the sector.
The goal must be a coherent framework by which federal and state authorities complement each other, encourage funding and assist tourism improvement.
Before the states give up, share or redefine any facet of their legislative competence, they need to perceive exactly what they stand to realize, what they may lose and what safeguards are required.
Otherwise, we might uncover too late that, in making an attempt to resolve right now’s regulatory dispute, we’ve constitutionally entrenched the situations for tomorrow’s greater one.
.Diala, is Executive Director; International Hospitality, Tourism & Eco-sustainability Forum (IHTEF)
