The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, looking for an evidence from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over the administration of greater than ₦126.46 billion allotted for electoral actions.
The lawsuit follows issues raised within the 2023 audited report of the Auditor-General of the Federation, revealed on August 7, 2026, which examined authorities expenditure for various intervals, together with transactions between January and December 2022 and a few extending to December 31, 2023.
SERAP needs the court to compel INEC to disclose how the cash was spent and supply supporting monetary data displaying the quantities acquired and disbursed, the recipients of funds, the contractors concerned and their helpful homeowners.
The organisation stated the funds have been earmarked for a number of election-related bills, together with poll containers, voting gear, delicate election supplies, end result sheets, autos, voter accreditation units, audit and consultancy companies, digital archiving and different operational necessities.
In its court motion, SERAP alleged that the audit findings raised questions on whether or not among the funds had been diverted, mismanaged, misplaced or left with out correct accounting. The allegations haven’t been established by a court.
The organisation argued that Nigerians ought to find a way to scrutinise the expenditure as a result of the funds have been meant to assist the administration of elections, a constitutional accountability central to the nation’s democratic course of.
It additional contended that the problems recognized within the audit report might elevate questions on compliance with the 1999 Constitution, as amended, related anti-corruption laws and Nigeria’s commitments below the United Nations Convention in opposition to Corruption.
SERAP’s authorized staff, comprising Kolawole Oluwadare, Kehinde Oyewumi and Andrew Nwankwo, filed the go well with on the organisation’s behalf.
The organisation maintained that public entry to details about electoral spending was important to democratic accountability, arguing that residents have a proper to know the way cash allotted to INEC was utilised. However, the Federal High Court has but to schedule a listening to for the case.
